Khondokar Nazmus Sakib Abstract- Bangladesh is a land of about 16.5 core people. So, high population, industrialization and urb...
Khondokar Nazmus Sakib
Abstract- Bangladesh is a land of about 16.5 core
people. So, high population, industrialization and urbanization demands huge electric power. The government of Bangladesh now is in troublesome 
condition to provide huge electricity. The government of the country has already taken some necessary steps like 
hydroelectric power plant, coal based power plants, gas based power plants, oil based power plants and some 
power plants of renewable sources. But those are not sufficient according to the demand. That’s why 
government is trying to introduce first nuclear power plant. “I believe it fulfills the nation's dream,” Prime 
Minister Sheikh Hasina said this after laying the foundation stone of Bangladesh’s first nuclear power 
plant on 2 October 2013 in Rooppur, Pabna. Some debate has already begun against this power plant. But 
to resolve energy crisis of Bangladesh government should introduce modern (generation 3+ VVER-1200, 
VVER TOI) nuclear power plant.
Keywords: bangladesh, RNPP, nonrenewable, nuclear power plant, safety.
Keywords: bangladesh, RNPP, nonrenewable, nuclear power plant, safety.
I. INTRODUCTION
In recent times there has been a growing trend worldwide of adopting alternative source of energy in policy framework in the context of diminishing reserve of fossil fuel as well as the detrimental impact of its burning on environment and human health. Renewable and environment friendly energy sources come into consideration to tackle future energy crisis. Renewable energy sources like solar 
energy, wind energy etc. cannot cope with the huge consumption demands of industrialization and 
urbanization. In this perspective nuclear energy is considered as a suitable alternative, provided necessary safety measures are in place. Nuclear power plants are especially suitable for countries like Bangladesh having huge population and limited land area and resources. The prospect of nuclear energy had been recognized in policy plans of Bangladesh and necessary steps are being taken for early 
implementation of Rooppur Nuclear Power, Project at Rooppur, Pabna.
II How Nuclear Power Plant Works
Just like a fossil (Coal, Gas, Diesel) fuel power plant, in nuclear power plant water is turned into 
steam, which in turn drives turbine generators to produce electricity. The difference between them is the source 
of heat. In nuclear power plant, when nuclear fission takes place, the produced heat turn water into steam. 
There is no combustion in a nuclear reactor. There are two types of nuclear reactors.
a) Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR): In pressurized water reactor, water is boiled under high pressure so that water in reactor vessel 
does not boil but heats. This heated water transfers the heat to the water in the steam generator. Water in the steam generator then is converted to steam and then turns the turbine generator. The generator then produces electricity. Water from the reactor vessel and 
the water in the steam generator that is turned into steam never intermingle.
a) Boiling Water Reactor (BWR): In Boiling Water Reactors (also known as BWRs), the water heated by fission actually boils and 
turns into steam to turn the turbine generator. In both PWRs and BWRs, the steam is turned back into water and can be used again in the
 process.
III. How Energy Released from Nuclear Fission
The sum of masses of the protons and neutrons that comprise the nucleus exceeds the mass of the atomic nucleus. The difference in mass is called mass defect. The mass defect is converted to energy in a nuclear reaction is given by Einstein’s law: ΔE=ΔmC2.
This equation shows that lost mass (mass defect) will convert into energy. And by the same process we get the fission energy.
By fission process we extract nuclear energy from nucleus. In this process nucleus of an atom splits into smaller parts. Fission is a form of nuclear transmutation because the resulting fragments are not the same element as the original atom.
One of the fission products is represented as:
235U+ 1n = 236U = 148La+ 85Br+31n
The mass equation for the above reaction is given as (in atomic mass unit):
 
235.124 + 1.009 =147.96 + 84.938 +
3.029
The mass deficiency on the right hand side of above mass equation is 0.207 atomic mass unit or 
0.3436×10-27 kg. This mass will convert into energy.
The equivalent release of energy in view of Einstein’s law:
The equivalent release of energy in view of Einstein’s law:
ΔE
=ΔmC2
=0.3436×10-27×9×1016
=3.0924×10-11Joules/atom
Now, one kg of uranium will have approximate 26.029×1023atoms. If it is assumed that all the atoms have undergone fission, the total amount of released energy will be: 
E=3.0924×10-11×26.029×1023
= 80.49×1012joules/kg
The above released energy is approximately equivalent to 2.7 million kg of coal, 2 million m3 of natural gas and 1.78 million kg of fuel oil.
IV Comparing Radioactive Waste to Other Waste
In countries with nuclear power, radioactive 
wastes comprise less than 1% of total industrial toxic 
wastes, much of which remains hazardous for long 
periods. Overall, nuclear power produces far less 
waste material by volume than fossil-fuel (Coal, Gas, 
Diesel) based power plants. The flue gas from 
combustion of the fossil fuels is discharged in the air. 
This gas contains carbon dioxide and water vapor, as 
well as other substances such as Nitrogen oxides 
(NOx), Sulfur oxides (SOx), Mercury, traces of other 
metals, and, for coal-fired plants, fly ash. Fossil fuel 
power stations emit CO2, a greenhouse gas (GHG) 
which according to a consensus opinion of scientific 
organizations is a contributor to global warming as it 
has been observed over the last 100 years.
A 2008 report from Oak Ridge National 
Laboratory (ORNL) concluded that coal power actually 
results in more radioactivities being released into the 
environment than nuclear power operation. Indeed, 
coal ash is much less radioactive than nuclear fuel on 
a weight per weight basis, but coal ash is produced in 
much higher quantities per unit of energy generated, 
and this is released directly into the environment as fly 
ash, whereas nuclear plants use shielding to protect 
the environment from radioactive materials, for 
example, in dry cask storage vessels. An international 
organization has raised serious questions about the 
much-debated Rampal coal-fired power plant, saying it 
does not maintain the minimum social and 
environmental standards.
V Nuclear Energy in Bangladesh
The nuclear power plant will be built at Rooppur, on the banks of the Padma River, in the Ishwardi subdistrict of Pabna, in the northwest of the country
The proposal was first raised in 1961. 
Government took 253.90 acre of land of current place 
at that year to build the plant. In 1963 the plant was 
approved. Discussions took place with the Canadian 
government in 1964 and 1966. Discussions with the 
governments of Sweden and Norway were also going 
on in those years. However, no real progress was 
achieved. After the independence of Bangladesh, the 
Government of Bangladesh started discussion with the 
Soviet Union in 1974 however, which was not 
successful.
Finally, In February 2011, Bangladesh got an 
agreement with Russia to build the 2,000 megawatt 
(MW) Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant with two reactors. 
The Rooppur Nuclear Power Project (RNPP) is 
estimated to cost up to US$2 billion, and is going to 
start operating by 2021.The inter-governmental 
agreement (IGA) was officially signed on 2 November 
2011. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina laying the 
foundation stone of Bangladesh’s first nuclear power 
plant on 2 october 2013 in Rooppur, Pabna. Prime 
Minister Sheikh Hasina, gave the final go-ahead to the 
draft Nuclear Power Plant Act 2015.
But several separate issues were raised, from 
the unsuitability of the site to the obsolescence of the 
VVER-1000 model (Pressurized Water Reactor 
(PWR)) proposed, questionable financing 
arrangements and a lack of agreement with Russia 
no technical expertise or skilled manpower to 
undertake such a complex and high tech project. 
Generation 2 model Nuclear power plant falls in 
accident  like in 1979 Three Mile island (US) accident, 
in 1986 Chernobyl (Ukraine) accident and  in 2011 
Fukushima (Japan) accident .Generation 2 type 
nuclear power plant was less protective from any type 
of natural and manmade disaster. Life span of this 
reactor was in between 25 to 30 years. It takes long 
time to build this type of reactor and its waste 
production rate is high. That’s why VVER -1000 model 
was introduced and this model is known as generation 
3 nuclear power plant. Russia went to build 
generation-3 VVER-1000 model nuclear power plant in 
India but this project face public resistance due to low 
grade instruments.
Bangladesh can take learning from this. 
Generation-3+ VVER-1200 model is more efficient, 
safe and modern then generation-3 VVER-1000.  
Bangladesh government may go for generation-3+ 
VVER-1200 model nuclear reactor which is also known 
as evolutionary reactor. This type of reactor fulfills the 
requirements of the IAEA and the EUR. VVER TOI 
model is more modern than VVER-1200. This VVER 
TOI model has some specific characteristics like, high 
endurance power in earthquake and tornado, high 
endurance power in aircraft crashes and flood, fuel 
efficient, less waste production etc. Russia is going to 
build this type of plant in their country and Turkey.
Rooppur nuclear power project is likely to cost around 
$10 billion, more than three times the initial estimate of 
the government. The project's Russian developer 
Rosatom has been dropping hints since last year that 
the cost may go up to $10 billion. A couple of years 
ago the government had estimated that the plant 
would cost between $2 billion and $3 billion. 
Bangladesh is seeking 90 percent of the project 
financing from Russia. The loan will be repaid in 28 
years with a 10-year grace period. But similar power 
plants being built by Russia in different countries are 
coming with a price tag between $10 billion and $13 billion
over nuclear waste disposal. Besides, Bangladesh has no technical expertise or skilled manpower to 
undertake such a complex and high tech project. 
Generation 2 model Nuclear power plant falls in 
accident  like in 1979 Three Mile island (US) accident, 
in 1986 Chernobyl (Ukraine) accident and  in 2011 
Fukushima (Japan) accident .Generation 2 type 
nuclear power plant was less protective from any type 
of natural and manmade disaster. Life span of this 
reactor was in between 25 to 30 years. It takes long 
time to build this type of reactor and its waste 
production rate is high. That’s why VVER -1000 model 
was introduced and this model is known as generation 
3 nuclear power plant. Russia went to build 
generation-3 VVER-1000 model nuclear power plant in 
India but this project face public resistance due to low 
grade instruments.
Bangladesh can take learning from this. 
Generation-3+ VVER-1200 model is more efficient, 
safe and modern then generation-3 VVER-1000.  
Bangladesh government may go for generation-3+ 
VVER-1200 model nuclear reactor which is also known 
as evolutionary reactor. This type of reactor fulfills the 
requirements of the IAEA and the EUR. VVER TOI 
model is more modern than VVER-1200. This VVER 
TOI model has some specific characteristics like, high 
endurance power in earthquake and tornado, high 
endurance power in aircraft crashes and flood, fuel 
efficient, less waste production etc. Russia is going to 
build this type of plant in their country and Turkey.
Rooppur nuclear power project is likely to cost around 
$10 billion, more than three times the initial estimate of 
the government. The project's Russian developer 
Rosatom has been dropping hints since last year that 
the cost may go up to $10 billion. A couple of years 
ago the government had estimated that the plant 
would cost between $2 billion and $3 billion. 
Bangladesh is seeking 90 percent of the project 
financing from Russia. The loan will be repaid in 28 
years with a 10-year grace period. But similar power 
plants being built by Russia in different countries are 
coming with a price tag between $10 billion and $13 billion
The plant is located in an earthquake zone, 
that’s why construction cost goes high. Additional 
safety installations also add up to the cost. In addition, 
lack of qualified nuclear power engineers, enterprises, 
employees increases the project cost. On top of that, 
the country has no industrial infrastructure and the 
transport system is absolutely rudimentary. Most of the 
materials to be used in the plant such as the quality 
assured high grade stainless steel, pipes, valves, 
pumps and other components will have to be imported 
and the cost will increase. This site is also vulnerable 
to flood and tornadoes.
Site is located in the severe flood region. Site is located in the earthquake region.
When Pakistan had proposed the site, it was a sparsely populated area. In contrast, right now, it is a         
densely populated region. Ishwardi Upazila has population density of 1186 (per sq km). Any sign of an 
accident would necessitate an immediate evacuation of all the people in the 20 sq km area adjacent to the
nuclear power plant. But to evacuate the whole population on a long term or lifetime basis from a 20 sq km area in the most densely populated country and relocate them will be a virtually prohibitive, most challenging and arduous task. Soil of Rooppur is soft 
in nature, that’s why some initiative has to take to stable this soil.
We have to think about geopolitics. During the 
first half of the year, much of the water of the river is 
already withdrawn by India through the Farakka 
Barrage, leaving insufficient cooling water for the plant 
and other activities in Bangladesh. According to 
debate about nuclear power plant some advanced 
countries like Germany, Italy, Switzerland have all 
given up nuclear power plants and with Japan is 
tapering down nuclear power production after the 
Fukushima disaster, Bangladesh seems to be charging 
ahead recklessly. But we have to remember that still 
now 30 countries worldwide are operating 438 nuclear 
reactors for electricity generation and 67 new nuclear 
plants are under construction in 15 countries. In spite 
of these threats, nuclear power plant is the best 
decision to meet rapidly increasing demand and 
reduce dependence on natural gas. But these threats 
should be kept in mind.
VI. Result
From this research, the result is obtained that 
it is perfect time to introduce modern nuclear power 
plant for Bangladesh. Because this plant will be able to 
resolve the power crisis of Bangladesh and it will 
sustain for a long time. Bangladesh use natural gas 
and coal for most of its electricity production.
But these sources of energy create serious 
environment pollution, and these sources will finish 
one day. Because, these sources are not renewable 
sources. That’s why Bangladesh has to go for 
alternative power sources. Already Bangladesh has 
started to use some renewable energy sources those 
are environment friendly. But these sources produced 
small range of energy. So by considering the entire 
problem regarding nuclear power plant, Bangladesh 
should go for modern (generation 3+ VVER-1200, 
VVER TOI) nuclear power plant. Initial coasting may 
be high but thinking about future safety Bangladesh 
government should go for modern nuclear reactor.
VII. Conclusion
Now a days for lower Greenhouse Gas
Emission, Efficiency, Reliability, Cheap Electricity, Low 
Fuel Cost, Easy Transportation nuclear energy has got 
top most priority. But we have to remember the 
accidents of nuclear power plant, like in 1979 Three 
Mile island (US) accident, in 1986 Chernobyl (Ukraine) 
accident and  in 2011 Fukushima (Japan) accident 
were devastating.  Now a days it has become very 
challenging to generate sufficient electric power for 
Bangladesh to meet the energy demand with its rapid 
growing population and industrialization.
The Government of the country is trying to 
lessen the power crisis by taking several initiatives like 
small (10-20MW) power plants, coal based power 
station, IPP (Independent Power Producer), QRPP 
(quick rental power plant) and small scale renewable 
energy plants. But these are not a permanent solution. 
Moreover, QRPP and IPP are mainly oil and gas 
based, which are very costly and these are also not 
very efficient. Besides coal based power station are 
required very large space, its initial cost is high and 
create serious environmental threat to the 
surroundings. In this perspective nuclear energy is 
considered as a suitable alternative for Bangladesh, 
provided necessary safety measures are in place and 
we can hope that this plant will resolve energy crisis of 
Bangladesh. Initial coasting may be high but thinking 
about future safety and efficiency Bangladesh 
government should consider modern nuclear reactor.
REFERENCES RÈFÈRENCES REFERENCIAS
1. Drivers and Impediments Regional Cooperation on
the Way to Sustainable Nuclear Energy  Systems 
IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, Austria, 30 July – 03 
August 2012.  Md. Kabir Hossain Senior Scientific 
Officer, Nuclear Power & Energy Division, 
Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission.
2. Khizir Mahmud, Sayidul Morsalin & Md. Shamsul
Alam, “Holistic Technological Guideline of Nuclear 
Power Plant Inception of Bangladesh and 
Developing Countries.” Global Journal of 
Researches in Engineering Electrical and 
Electronics Engineering.Volume 13 Issue 2 
Version 1.0 Year 2013.
3. Md. Asad Rahman, Md. Zahid Hasan and Md. 
Rakibul Islam, “The Prospects of Nuclear Power  
in the Bangladesh.” International Journal of 
Renewable Energy Technology Research Vol. 1, 
No. 1, PP: 15 - 22, December 2012.
4. Tausif Ali, Iftekhar Zaman Arnab, Saiful Islam 
Bhuiyan, Anik Rahman, Iftekhar Hossain, M.  
Shidujaman, “ Feasibility Study of RNPP (Rooppur 
Nuclear Power Project) in Bangladesh.” Energy 
and Power Engineering, Vol. 5 No. 4B, 2013, pp. 
1526-1530.
5. World Nuclear Association. Safety of Nuclear 
Power Reactors
 







 
							     
							     
							     
							     
 
 
 
 
 
 

